Phone Tapping Case: IPS Officer Bhaskar Rao Unhappy files protest petition against Closure Report by CBI

Pramesh S Jain.Yogesh K Porwar

 

 

Senior IPS officer Bhaskar Rao on Tuesday objecting to the closure report filed by CBI officials before the CBI special court in the phone tapping case on Monday,filed a protest petition to demand re-investigations.

“Yes, I filed a protest report in the CBI court today. Two years back the phone tapping was a big issue in which not only my phone but also those of several important people were tapped,” Rao.

In his petition Mr.Rao said that he is filing the petition as a protest complaint against acceptance of the Closure Report filed by the CBI agency in its Final Report .

He said that Investigation into the illegal and unauthorized telephonic interceptions of politicians,their relatives and the public servants from August 2018 till the date of the assignment of the investigation by the then Additional commissioner of police (crime) and handing over the details to a woman journalist for publication to defame him and the department .

Initially the CBI had prima facie evidence about the involvement of the two but after more than two and a half years of investigation during which not a single person was shown as either a suspect or an accused,the CBI has filed this Closure Report.

Even though some of the expert opinion reports are admittedly awaited by the CBI from CFSL, Hyderabad the hurried manner of filing the Closure Report does not inspire confidence in the eyes of rule of law and is questionable .

The final opinion of the CBI to drop the proceedings does not justify its own findings, investigative references and collated documentary evidence.

The CBI’s anxiety for closure is contrast to what its own investigation has ascertained, he said in his petition.

The police officer also said that the government registered a case and transferred it to the CBI because its implications were far and wide.

Two years after the incident,the CBI came with a report that not a single person has been named and wanted to close the case,Rao said.

He added that he got a certified copy through his lawyers,based on which a protest petition was prepared and filed in the CBI special court.

The case had caused quite a furore in the administrative and political circles as it pertained to the purported conversation between Rao and Faraz Ahmed allegedly seeking the Congress top leadership”s support to get the former posted as the Bengaluru police commissioner.

When the coalition government collapsed in 2019 and the BJP government came to power,a week after taking charge,the BS Yediyurappa-led state government transferred Alok Kumar as Bengaluru Commissioner of police and appointed Bhaskar Rao in his place.

Soon after,the purported audio was allegedly leaked to a journalist in a Kannada news channel who then aired it.Before making it public, the journalist had sent a message and email to Rao seeking his side of the story.

Alarmed by it,Rao ordered an inquiry and later the government,on the request of Rao and the recommendation of the then Director General of Police,handed over the case to the CBI to probe it.

The CBI report in the special court says that a head constable in the Technical Support Centre (TSC) had got instructions for lawful interception of phone calls of Faraz Ahmed and he heard Rao talking to him.

The CBI report says,Investigation has revealed that on August 2, 2019, Alok Kumar had asked Mirza Ali Raza,Inspector of the TSC to bring the calls pertaining to on Faraz,Misbah Uncle,and Mysore councillor and available important calls of Crime No 157/2018 of Wilson Garden police station in a pen drive to his office.

On Mirza Ali Raza”s instruction,head constable Anand handed over the pen drive along with head phone and laptop to Alok Kumar.

The CBI in its recommendation said that there was no direct evidence to prove with certainty that who has leaked the intercepted audio files and from where the journalist got the access of these intercepted audio files.

It said in view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances and in absence of sufficient concrete evidence,allegations of the FIR could not sustain.

It is,therefore, prayed the final report/closure report in this regard may kindly be accepted,the premier investigation agency said.